Train the whole team before the next inspection
Seat licences for the department or the site, a manager view of progress and results, and completion records exported for the training matrix. Hosted on The GMP Training Academy.
Against the classroom course you were quoted
Budget holders compare on total cost, not list price. This does the comparison honestly, including the time your people spend away from the line.
Compare with the classroom course you were quoted
Enter your numbers. Nothing is stored. Time off site is counted for both options, and the online course is charged at its 3 hours of study, not zero.
- Classroom fees (12 × €1,400)
- €16,800
- Classroom time off site (12 × 2 d × €450)
- €10,800
- Classroom total
- €27,600
- Online seats (12 × €0, 5 to 19 seats, 15% off)
- Enter a budget
- Online study time (3 h each)
- €2,160
- Online total
- Enter a budget
You keep
€25,440
and nobody leaves the site for two days before the inspection.
Trained people make fewer defects, close faster and stay.
Regulators treat training as part of the quality system, not a favour to staff: EU GMP Chapter 2 requires it, requires its effectiveness to be assessed, and requires the records to prove it. The evidence says the same thing in numbers. Below: what the published studies found, what it looks like on your deviation KPIs, and the clause behind it.
41%
fewer quality defects
in the most engaged teams compared with the least engaged, across 112,000 business units. Engagement and development opportunities are measured together. [1]
26%
greater ability to deliver quality products
in organisations with a strong learning culture compared with those without. [2]
37%
higher employee productivity
in the same strong-learning-culture organisations; output per person, not hours. [2]
94%
would stay longer
of employees, at a company that invests in their learning. Retention is the quality metric nobody puts on the dashboard. [3]
The deviation KPIs a trained team moves
These are the numbers a QA head reports at management review and an inspector asks for. No invented percentages here: measure yours before and six months after, and you will have your own.
- 01
Overdue deviations
Measured as: % of open records past target
Lower is better
Investigators who know the method finish sooner, and extend properly with a rationale when they cannot. Overdue falls; controlled extension replaces silent lateness.
- 02
Repeat deviations
Measured as: % recurring within 12 months
Lower is better
Root causes that can be changed produce CAPA that works. The same failure mode stops coming back with a different name on it.
- 03
Right-first-time records
Measured as: % closed without QA rework
Higher is better
Problem statements, scopes and impact assessments written to the standard the first time. QA review becomes review, not rewriting.
- 04
Time to closure
Measured as: median days, raised to approved
Lower is better
Containment on day one, a timeline before any analysis, evidence cited by identifier. Less back-and-forth, fewer reopened records.
- 05
CAPA effectiveness
Measured as: % of checks passed
Higher is better
Effectiveness checks designed before implementation, measuring recurrence rather than completion. Passed checks mean the fix worked.
- 06
Investigator satisfaction and retention
Measured as: survey score up; % turnover in QA
Lower is better
People stay where they are competent and developed. Every QA departure costs recruitment, onboarding and months of reduced capacity.
Be first when the course opens
Leave a work email. You are notified before public launch and get the launch price. Nothing else is sent.
Sources
- [1]Gallup (2020). The Relationship Between Engagement at Work and Organizational Outcomes: Q12 Meta-Analysis, 10th edition. 112,312 business units in 96 countries. Top-quartile business units on engagement showed 41% fewer quality defects, 81% lower absenteeism and 18% to 43% lower turnover than bottom-quartile units. Cross-industry meta-analysis. Gallup's engagement measure includes development and learning opportunities.
- [2]Bersin and Associates (2010). High-Impact Learning Culture: The 40 Best Practices for Creating an Empowered Enterprise. Organisations with a strong learning culture were 26% more able to deliver quality products, showed 37% greater employee productivity and were 46% more likely to be first to market. Cross-industry survey of about 40,000 organisations.
- [3]LinkedIn Learning (2018). Workplace Learning Report: The Rise and Responsibility of Talent Development in the New Labor Market. 94% of employees would stay longer at a company that invested in their career development. Cross-industry employee survey.
- [4]EudraLex Volume 4, EU Guidelines for Good Manufacturing Practice, Part I, Chapter 2: Personnel (2013), paragraphs 2.10 to 2.13. ICH Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System (2008), section 2.4 Resource management. The regulatory requirement for training and for assessing its effectiveness.
Seats, oversight, records
- One seat per learner, assigned by the manager, transferable before first login
- Manager view: progress, assessment results by module, certificates issued
- Completion export (CSV) formatted for the training matrix
- Certificates with verifiable IDs an auditor can check
- Content mapped to your SOP numbers on request
- Optional live Q&A session with the course author for the team
Per seat, by tier
| 1 to 4 seats | List price | On launch |
| 5 to 19 seats | 15% off | On launch |
| 20 to 49 seats | 25% off | On launch |
| 50 seats and above | 35% off | On launch |
The discount tiers are fixed. The launch price is announced to the waitlist first.
Tell us the seat count and the deadline
A person replies within two working days with a quote, or you can buy seats directly on the academy.